Paulsen for President 2012
Why would I vote for Pat Paulsen
for president, why would I not? Perhaps it is because I am tired of voting
against a candidate rather than voting for one. Ronald Reagan was the last
candidate that I voted for, the last one I believed in, and the last one I
trusted. I cannot vote for Barack Obama because I do not believe a government
for the people should be bigger than the people. I do not believe in social
engineering or the power of a stranger who knows me not telling me what health
care procedures will secure a cure to my health problems. I go to the doctor
for that kind of advice and if I think there is better to be found I’ll seek
further. I don’t need the government telling me how to cook my food, what food
I can and cannot eat, how to raise my children, discipline my children, when
and where I can worship my God, and what God I can worship. I have a right to
speak my opinion, worship my God, fly the flag I have spilt blood to defend,
salute those who have defended me, honor those who sacrifice for me, and
protect my family and possession from those who would bring them harm. You
govern because you are a servant of the people and if you think otherwise you
are unfit to serve.
Mitt Romney’s five point plan for
economic recovery is solid as instead of taxing one segment of the population
to support another, a move that would lessen the investment needed to grow the
economy, he is freeing up those resources for investment. Building energy
independence is stopping the flow of American dollars to our enemies and
securing our independence from foreign debt. Education of the American people
to better equip them in the global market makes more since than a handout
without contributing to the general good of the nation. Braking down the trade
barriers that prohibit American businesses to complete ensures job growth and
riding entrepreneurs of excessive government regulations will make it possible
once again to dream in America. I could vote for that, it makes good common
since, but it lacks the long term vision of sound wisdom.
The trouble with Barack Obama and
Mitt Romney is that they both believe in a one world government. “Flying deep
under Washington’s radar is an upcoming (December) global climate change
conference in Copenhagen, the “United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change.”
It all sounds pretty politically
benign, doesn’t it? Not according to Christopher Monckton, who was a science
policy adviser to Margaret Thatcher. Monckton spoke to the Minnesota Free
Market Institute.
“I have read that treaty,”
Monckton said, “and what it says is this: that a One World Government is going
to be created. The word ‘government’ actually appears as the first of three
purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from
the countries of the West to Third World countries in satisfaction of what is
called, coyly, ‘climate debt’ — because we’ve been burning CO2 and they
haven’t. And we’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t. … And the
third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement. How many of
you think that the word ‘election’ or ‘democracy’ or ‘vote’ or ‘ballot’ occurs
anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesn’t appear
once.”
Monckton then warned that if
Obama were to sign the treaty, he would be flushing U.S. sovereignty down the
global toilet. He further pointed out that even though ratification of our
president’s signature on that treaty would need 67 votes in the Senate, it
could pass via a simple majority as an amendment to the cap-and-trade bill.(http://www.humanevents.com/2009/10/27/obamas-oneworld-government/
Mitt Romney is not only a Mormon;
he is a high priest in the Mormon Church.
The question we face today is
this: Is this simply a half-baked “prophecy” from a 19th century nut that we
need not fear. . . or is the very existence of America at stake?
The simple truth is the Mormon
temple in Washington, D.C. -- our nation’s capitol -- has a large room on its
upper floor that I believe was designed to house their theocratic government.
From this room, Mitt Romney, along with the Mormon prophet and the council of
elders plan to rule the United States of America.
Yes, it sounds far-fetched.
The point is that just like the
radical Muslims, the Mormon Church has a plan for America. Because of this it
grooms candidates for high office -- like Mitt Romney -- from among the Temple
Mormons. These candidates have taken blood oaths of obedience in an LDS Temple
ritual. First, they learn the secret signs, tokens, and handshakes necessary to
pass the sentinels and eventually enter the Celestial glory where, they
believe, they will become gods and goddesses, and populate new earths!
Next, they swear obedience to
certain laws that govern their membership in the church, their behavior, and
their obedience to the prophet.
Romney and the other high level
Temple Mormons clearly know that their “Kingdom of God” is, in reality, a
Mormon one-world government run by the church elders under the leadership of
their prophet.
So what does the Mormon Church
believe? Let’s face it! The aberrant doctrines espoused by the Mormon Church
prove their guilt:
• Mormonism
teaches that there are many gods. The Bible says “. . . For there is one God,
and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.”
• Mormonism
teaches that human beings can eventually attain godhood. The Bible says “. . .
there is no God beside me.”
• Mormonism
teaches that Jesus and Lucifer were brothers. The Bible says “For by [Jesus]
all things were created. . .” And that includes Lucifer and the other angels!
• Mormonism
teaches that Jesus sweated for our sins in the garden of Gethsemane. The Bible
says “And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to
reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in
earth, or things in heaven.”
• Mormonism
teaches that God the Father was once a man who eventually rose to godhood. The
Bible says that “. . . even from everlasting to everlasting, thou art God.”
• Mormonism
teaches that works are a requirement for salvation. The Bible says “For by
grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of
God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.” http://www.exposemittromney.com/letter.html)
The prophet Jeremiah was
appointed to reveal the sins of the people and the coming consequences for
Judah, the southern Kingdom of Israel. God told Jeremiah that the people would not
listen, they would reject his message, they would beat him, but they would not
be allowed killing him. As discouraging as that was Jeremiah was obedient and
prophesized the destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians. The Jewish nation
and their treasures were carried away by the Babylonian people and their King
The Babylon of Revelation
eighteen is the world system, a one world government, that one world government
we are so blindly marching towards. It amazes me that a book written over 1600
years by over 60 authors and that is completely cohesive cannot be accepted for
the truth is has consistently revealed without flaw. We who claim Jesus by our
faith, know Him personally, know the truth by our relationship with Him for His
testimony is the spirit of prophecy. We know as Jeremiah 626 years before the
Birth of Jesus that we are being carried away by Babylon.
I would not vote for Barack Obama
because I am not going to give up the Freedoms that even I have fought for. I
would not vote for Mitt Romney because I am not subjecting myself to a False
Theocracy. I will not vote for either one, as I will not sell the blood of my
forefathers so cheaply.
Enter upon the stage once again
Pat Paulsen. Pat Paulsen began his campaign for President in 1968 from the
stage of the Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour. He has ran his campaign repeatedly
in 1972, 1980, 1988, 1992, and finally in 1996. Pat Paulsen died in April of
1997 but he is far from forgotten. If Pat Paulsen were to revive his campaign
today I have to ask myself why I would not vote for him. Pat Paulsen knows
something that I know, and many Christians know, and all the dead know, the
truth.
Now that the Democrats and the
Republicans both want to allow the dead to vote, why not vote for a dead
candidate also.
Talk about your silent majority!
A new undercover video by James O’Keefe, the man who brought down ACORN, shows
voters receiving ballots for the New Hampshire primary despite the notable
handicap of being dead! http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2012/01/20/is-obama-courting-the-dead-vote/
In a remarkable reversal, the GOP
has changed course from trying to reduce the voter roles and now claims that
the best way to strengthen our democracy is to protect the right of all
legitimate American citizens to vote, living or dead.
“This is the civil rights
struggle of our time,” asserted Florida Governor Rick Scott, “Inanimate
Americans have been victims of prejudice all of their afterlives and it’s time
that this open bigotry was ended once and for all. It’s our duty to them, if we
don’t stand up and speak for them, who will?” http://planetpov.com/2012/06/20/republicans-fight-to-allow-the-dead-to-vote/
A truthful dead president will do
us no greater harm than the living alternatives we have given ourselves to cry
over. Perhaps there is one other, “My hope is built on nothing less Than Jesus’
blood and righteousness. I dare not trust the sweetest frame, But wholly trust
in Jesus’ Name.”
Dan 2:20 "It is He who
changes the times and the epochs; He removes kings and establishes kings; He
gives wisdom to wise men And knowledge to men of understanding.
